The practitioner wished to insert a clause in their interlocking IVAs that provided for a single variation meeting to be held (in the event of variation being required) and for votes of each debtors’ creditors to be treated equally as between them. Would this be acceptable?
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.